Experienced presenter–Maybe, Maybe Not
Jun 23rd, 2010 by Cathy Jo Nelson
Yesterday and today I attended the Upstate Technology Conference sponsored and hosted by Greenville County School District (Greenville, SC). My friends and I presented a hands-on session that promised sandbox playtime to learn one or all of the tools we presented. Here is how our session read in the conference booklet:
There’s An App for That: Using Web Apps to Organize, Simplify, and Enrich Your Life
Room: 106
Come learn about web applications and 2.0 tools that help educators both streamline and enhance their professional (and personal) lives. See real examples and learn tricks and tips as Cathy, Heather, and Fran take attendees through a tool showcase (including Evernote, Dropbox, and iGoogle). Leave equipped to “organize, simplify, and enrich” your life knowing “there’s an app for that!”
I had a great time networking with friends that are a major part of my PLN–ones I see only on a conference basis for the most part. We had fun spending time with the vendors, the other presenters, and conference attendees.
I’ve been presenting at conferences for many years, so one would think I had this down pat. But as I reflect tonight with my copresenters Fran Bullington and Heather Loy (in a Google shared document no less) I am disappointed in some major issues we had.
Our session was scheduled for a lab (as requested) so that we could give attendees time to sign on, open, and “play” with the tools! We purposefully planned to spend 30 minutes or less of our time showcasing, demonstrating, and giving examples of use for the tools. The remaining 30 minutes was supposed to be so attendees could get in the mix and have three people available to answer questions. Our past presentation experience tells us that attendees want to get in the tool. Will Richardson says before educators can have a vision for engaging learners using tools, they themselves must embrace and learn them. Our goal was to indeed provide opportunity and be available to answer questions or offer help.
It was a good plan. Only we ran into a few snafus–ain’t Murphy’s law so much fun?
- The day before I heard in Chris Craft‘s session on presentations how IMPORTANT it was to have a “Plan B.” We did not have a Plan B, and with three minutes before go-time, we had no Internet connection. WHAT!!?? Thank goodness Heather had her aircard. Whew!
- We were in a standard school lab (estimated thirty workstations.) When we learned this we were so happy!! But we quickly realized after getting in there we would not have a lot of extra room to move around to help folks. It was a tight little room VERY crowded. We were not going to be able to easily move between attendees to answer questions or help –and remember there were THREE of us.
- We had given thought to presenting it twice, but nixed as selfishly I told my copresenters it would limit us in what we could attend ourselves. So when our room was full, every seat taken, we still had attendees piling in, bringing chairs from other rooms. I did not want to tell them they could not come, and thought maybe (hopefully) when the hands on time came, the ones without a workstation would leave. This did not happen. So providing the one on one time to help or answer questions was extremely limited and difficult.
- In our quest to be digital, I suggested we make our handout a wiki or online document. Fran Bullington had even created a handout to go with her part, but I frowned on it (sorry Fran!!!) and convinced her to embed it as a pdf that attendees could download. And she did it. I forget though that there are many educators who are not at the point where they can give up that physical handout, and when many of the attendees found out we weren’t offering one, their displeasure was noticeable. As we presented the “sit and get” part (uggghhh), we had many interrupt numerous times to ask us to read out URLs. Totally NOT their fault.
- We had business cards made to give out that included contact info and URLs they would need, but in our brainy planning, since we were in a thirty workstation lab, we only brought thirty. That wound up being a not so great idea. BUT the business cards were BEAUTIFUL (thanks to Heather!!)
Is that enough snafu info? We had our share. Im sure I could list other issues, but I’m trying to focus on the ones where I have yet again learned a lesson. So Here are the game plans for this presentation that will happen again at the end of July at the SCETV Summer Workshops:
- Despite my general dislike of handouts, make one that minimally has URLs. Sigh. Maybe a postcard like the one Doug Johnson used at SCASL a few years ago. And HAVE MANY!
- Make one web portal too with all the necessary links, and in the lab setting we will be in, have that page fully loaded and ON the screen for the attendees. We had three separate pages, and so had to share these URLs frequently during our presentation and sandbox time. I’m sure this was very frustrating too our attendees (as shared in our exit survey.)
- In our lab setting, once all the computers are taken, CLOSE the door and don’t allow anyone else in. I really felt bad that we had so many in our room without access. But after today’s fiasco, despite how bad it will make me feel, I know this is a MUST to have attendees have a good experience.
- Since apparently our topic was pretty popular (dare I think we as presenters drew such a crowd??) we should have done the session two times. I have already contacted the SCETV workshop organizers and let them know we can do it twice there if needed. (And the SCETV workshop folks were there, so they know how it was!)
To leave on a positive note, I must thank Fran Bullington and Heather Loy for working with me and collaborating to have a really dynamic (and apparently very popular) session for UTC and SCETV. We will do SO MUCH better next time ladies! We are, afterall, the media muskateers!
Thanks to Pat “Loonyhiker” Hensley for taking our picture!!















Everyone always has snafus…if they don’t, they just weren’t aware of them
Being able to reflect on your professional development is key!
So what’s the URL?
Can’t believe I did not include URLs (yes plural) for our UTC gig.
Mine
Fran Bullington
Heather Loy
Our desire to constantly improve and ask for honest feedback is part of being experienced presenters. Even the best presenters (Chris Craft, for example) question their sessions afterwards and ask for feedback. There is always room for improvement.
As Nationally Board Certified teachers, we have learned that reflection is the way to grow and we began that process IMMEDIATELY! I guess I am patting ourselves on the backs here, but I think the fact that we not only began discussing in person how our session went, but as soon as we all arrived safely home from the conference we continued that conversation online, shows our desire to help others with our topic.
The session may not have gone as smoothly as we would have liked (most of it due to the room layout), but we are using this as a learning experience and our July session at the ETV Summer Workshops will reflect our commitment to improve for the benefit of our participants.
Okay, now lift your right arm, bend your elbow towards your back, and then proceed to pat yourself on the back. Your desire to continually improve deserves it!
The URLs did not come through in your comment above, so I’ll try to add them here myself:
Cathy’s presentation is located at http://cathyjonelson.wikispaces.com/UsingDropbox
Heather’s presentation is located at
http://web.mac.com/hloy/WSHSLMC/Evernote_Presentation.html
Fran’s presentation is located at
http://bulldogden.wikispaces.com/Using+Personal+Home+Pages+to+Organize+Your+Online+Life
Despite the glitches, I’m sure everyone who attended your session was glad they did so.
Your post-presentation reflection is valuable – it would be wonderful if more people took the time to dissect workshop experiences from both sides, as presenters and participants.
Wonderful posting…can’t wait to see you in DC!
Okay, now that I’ve had some proper sleep, I feel ready to write a reflections post on UTC and our presentation on my own blog. As the inexperienced presenter on the panel, I felt that despite our hiccups, the session was a success, but it could definitely have been better in some regards. We need to meet up again (either virtually or in person – can we say car trip!) to facilitate a smoother presentation at ETV next month.
[...] on the presentation I helped with at the Upstate Technology Conference. If you haven’t read it yet, you may want to go read it, as this is a follow-up of [...]