<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To be or not to be&#8211;Wikipedia as a source?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cathyjonelson.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cathyjonelson.com/?p=945</link>
	<description>Each TechnoTuesday</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 01:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://blog.cathyjonelson.com/?p=945&#038;cpage=1#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cathyjonelson.com/?p=945#comment-2428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing this video - I&#039;ll definitely be passing it along.  What is funny is that I had a conversation about this very topic a couple of weeks ago with an English teacher and her English 2 honors students.  The teacher told them not to use it and that it was a bad source.  She then asked me to explain the site - expecting me to back her up.  When I said it wasen&#039;t a good or bad site, just one you need to evaluate  the information &amp; where it came from, she wasn&#039;t happy.  I explained how the articles were edited and about the edit history page.  She relented enough to say they could use it as a starting point, but not to rely on the info they found there.  What I&#039;m surprised about is that it is no longer blocked by my district!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this video &#8211; I&#8217;ll definitely be passing it along.  What is funny is that I had a conversation about this very topic a couple of weeks ago with an English teacher and her English 2 honors students.  The teacher told them not to use it and that it was a bad source.  She then asked me to explain the site &#8211; expecting me to back her up.  When I said it wasen&#8217;t a good or bad site, just one you need to evaluate  the information &amp; where it came from, she wasn&#8217;t happy.  I explained how the articles were edited and about the edit history page.  She relented enough to say they could use it as a starting point, but not to rely on the info they found there.  What I&#8217;m surprised about is that it is no longer blocked by my district!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teacherninja</title>
		<link>http://blog.cathyjonelson.com/?p=945&#038;cpage=1#comment-2424</link>
		<dc:creator>teacherninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cathyjonelson.com/?p=945#comment-2424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree!  Why waste any resource--especially one that&#039;s as free and awesome as Wikipedia.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree!  Why waste any resource&#8211;especially one that&#8217;s as free and awesome as Wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
